Piccadilly Jim – P.G. Wodehouse
Another slice of Wodehouseian merriment , in which mayhem is created with the usual effortlessly entertaining results. Like imbibing expensive brandy whilst wearing a smoking jacket.
My musings on what I've read since January 2006.
Another slice of Wodehouseian merriment , in which mayhem is created with the usual effortlessly entertaining results. Like imbibing expensive brandy whilst wearing a smoking jacket.
This is a curious, broken-backed novel. The first half is a reasonably interesting family melodrama, but then there is a sudden five year hiatus and we pick up the story in time for the Gordon Riots, in which anti-Catholic mobs burned down half of London. The odd structure rather wrecks the plot (which is largely irrelevant anyway) but the riots themselves are superbly executed.
I managed 101 books last year, an increase of a massive one from 2006. Still, I ploughed through War and Peace which is pretty good.
A series of reader Q&As from New Scientist, this was a fairly entertaining, informative and brisk read. It concentrates largely on the trivial or bizarre – I had to laugh at the discussion of what becomes of the bullets that get fired up in the air at raucous street celebrations in the Middle East (hint – it’s not such a great idea).
This is a pretty good novel, but I doubt it was the best novel of the year despite winning the Booker.
Another trip to Greeneland, another superb novel. As usual, it is a kind of moral thriller that gives us utterly believable characters engaged in all-too-human behaviour that leads to catastrophe. Sobering, humane and quite brilliant.
This is the splendidly titled memoirs of Australia’s leading film authority, who also happens to be the teacher on the film course I have been attending for the last few years.
As my mate Ben once said of Malone Dies, the title gives away the ending. This struck me as fairly minor Tolstoy, although it is apparently regarded very highly among his late works. Perhaps I am being deceived by the book’s brevity, or maybe I am right and the collective critical wisdom is full of it. Who knows?
It’s always slightly odd reading a book when you are very familiar with the film adaptation (Scorsese’s superb effort), but the quality of the writing on offer here easily transcended my mental obstacles to fully enjoying the novel. The convincing story of love thwarted by social convention is hardly an original theme, but the evocation of 1870s society (the book was written 50 years later) is dazzling and the emotional content resonates strongly.